Biodiversity
Two new fish species discovered in Swiss waters
The public can take part in a survey to decide on the names of two fish species discovered by Bárbara Calegari and her colleagues. In this interview, the biologist explains where they live and how to make the diversity of our waters visible.
Bárbara Calegari: No, not really. The genus of fish we were studying, Barbatula, is known for its genetic diversity. However, the individual species have a similar morphology, meaning similar external traits, which makes it difficult to identify differences. The genus was described by early naturalists, but has hardly been studied since.
Where did you discover the new species of fish?The new species were both discovered in Swiss waters, but populate different habitats. One species lives in the fast-flowing streams and rivers of the Rhine system and extends into the Danube in Bavaria, Germany and Austria. The other species lives in the quieter lakes of the Aare system and appear in the Neuchâtel, Biel, Lucerne, Zurich and Walensee lakes. Fish belonging to the genus Barbatula inhabit waters in Europe and Asia.
How could you be sure that these were new species?We studied the fishes extensively using modern genetic methods, in terms of external traits (morphology), the bone development and structure (osteology) and their habitat (ecology). The studies discovered consistent differences to confirm and validate the two new species.
Vote and win!
Bárbara Calegari and the team from the University of Bern, the Natural History Museum of Bern and Eawag, in collaboration with the Wyss Academy for Nature, the Canton of Bern, the Federal Office for the Environment and the Swiss Competence Center for Fisheries, have discovered two new fish species in Swiss rivers and lakes. Now you can help to decide what the two new species should be called and, with a bit of luck, win two tickets to the Natural History Museum Bern!
The new fish species differ from the 13 European Barbatula species known so far both in terms of morphology and genetics. Morphological differences are particularly evident in the head and body structure: for example, how flat or long the trunk is, the length and position of the head relative to the body, the width of the head and the distance between the eyes, and the pigmentation of the abdomen and chest. Compared to each other, the two new species have differences related to their habitats. The species living in fast-flowing waters has larger and stronger pectoral fins that give it stability and support in turbulent currents. By contrast, the species from calmer waters has smaller and more delicate pectoral fins and a larger swim bladder, which allows for better buoyancy control at different water depths.
No, there are around 36,400 known fish species worldwide, but many are still undiscovered. It is estimated that some 800 species have yet to be described in Europe alone. In Switzerland, fish species are often overlooked because their habitats are considered to be well researched. Since many European species were described over 200 years ago, few researchers have devoted themselves to these populations in recent years. However, modern DNA analyses make it easier to detect genetic differences and identify new species.
Can you give us an insider tip – where is the best place to look if you want to discover more fish species?There is no easy answer to that. The discovery of new fish species requires extensive expertise and often begins with catching an unusual specimen in the wild or by finding unidentified specimens in museum collections. The chance of finding new species is higher in remote, unexplored areas, such as tropical regions.
If it is confirmed to be a new species, selected specimens will be included as type material in a scientific collection and made available to research. This is followed by the formal description of the species – an indispensable step for documenting biodiversity. This involves documenting traits such as appearance, differences to related species, habitat and the name. Finally, everything is recorded in a publication that serves as a basis for further studies and the identification of more specimens.
No, it's not common to name a new species after yourself. The naming process is a creative process that is a lot of fun. Although it is possible to name a species after a person, most often a name is chosen that reflects a specific characteristic of the fish species – be it the appearance, the region where it is found or an aspect of its habitat. Scientific names are often Latin or Greek and follow the binomial nomenclature: They consist of the genus name, in our case Barbatula, and a specific epithet, the second part of the scientific name, which gives a more precise description or distinction of the species. This second part is still missing for our fish species. For the two new species, we would like to involve the population and give them the opportunity to help decide on the names in a survey.
How did you come up with the idea of letting the population take part in naming the fish?I think it gives us a good opportunity to raise awareness for biodiversity among the population. People can learn more about the fish species in their waters and at the same time be made aware of the worrying decline in biodiversity, especially in aquatic ecosystems. By actively involving the population in the discovery process, we want to promote a deeper connection to nature, encourage an interest in science and motivate them to protect biodiversity, also underwater.
The discovery of new species is crucial for species protection – because we cannot protect what we do not know. The description of a species documents its existence and allows for appropriate conservation planning. Intact freshwater ecosystems are also important for humans, and understanding their diversity is the key to protecting these habitats, with their already known species but also many undiscovered and yet to be described species.
About the person
Dr. Bárbara Borges Calegari
is a taxonomist, phylogeneticist and evolutionary biologist. In her research, she examines the biological patterns and ecological and evolutionary processes that have shaped the biological diversity of fish over time. She is currently working as a postdoc at the Institute of Ecology and Evolution in cooperation with the Wyss Academy for Nature at the University of Bern on a large-scale project to mitigate the effects of climate change on the diversity of freshwater fish in Switzerland.
Contact: barbara.calegari@unibe.ch
Aquatic Ecology and Evolution division
Fishes are the most diverse group of vertebrates, are key players in aquatic ecosystems, provide a diverse set of ecosystem services, and are sensitive to environmental change. The Aquatic Ecology and Evolution division of the Institute of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Bern studies their ecology, evolution, and conservation. It examines fish diversity from traits and genes in populations to the diversity of species assemblages, their change through time, and the consequences for the ecosystem.
Project LANAT-3
Bárbara Calegari and the team from the University of Bern, the Natural History Museum of Bern and Eawag, in collaboration with the Wyss Academy for Nature, the Canton of Bern, the Federal Office for the Environment, and the Swiss Competence Center for Fisheries discovered the unknown fish species as part of the LANAT-3 project on behalf of the Wyss Academy for Nature, the Canton of Bern and the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), in collaboration with the Swiss Competence Center for Fisheries.
Subscribe to the uniAKTUELL newsletter
Discover stories about the research at the University of Bern and the people behind it.
